Originally Posted by
trip
That theory doesn't stand throughout entire NATO architecture of airpower, and then you have the transport and helos in the USMC/NAVY/AirForce.
It's really nothing more then "that's how weve always done it" measure of finding a succesful candidate who will go on to become a leader.
Yes for the Navy/AF it's the honey that attracts the kind of people they want to go on to senior leadership. That requires education along the way, and lots of it. Slightly different animal than a journeyman professional.
The Navy has over the years had several programs for enlisted (or warrant/LDO) pilots. Those have never lasted, don't know why, but in recent decades those aviators were always limited to non-tailhook aircraft. I don't think that had anythig to do with flying ability, but rather tailhookers tend to promote to flag at a higher rate than non-tailhookers due to front-line vice support missions. I'm pretty sure they just wanted to reserve those slots for non-restricted comissioned officers.