Originally Posted by TED74

Fair enough. Poor choice of words on my part and I need to work on my delivery. In the end, though, “life isn’t fair” is probably the most efficient way I can sum up the challenges to “improving” a benefit that I don’t think will ever resemble the proposal. Allowing tens of thousands of employees to assign a benefit to any person - and specifically one whom the employee thinks could get the most use out of it -
would in my not so humble opinion wreak havoc on an already degraded benefit. Y’all can hash out all the intricacies, but I’m confident it won’t look significantly different a decade from now no matter what campaign you pull together.