View Single Post
Old 05-08-2024 | 03:49 PM
  #4210  
StoneQOLdCrazy's Avatar
StoneQOLdCrazy
Bent over by buybacks
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 454
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
If it were going to happen, it would have been best to have done it ~2-3 years ago when everyone was hiring everyone they could get onboarded/trained. At least then, the “shortage” arguments actually would have had some merit, and the impact would have been minimized.

The impact would have "been minimized?" "Best" to do it 2-3 years ago? And crush a big part of our leverage in the latest negotiating cycle? C'mon, man. If Age 67 was up and running or being implemented during negotiations, we would have done much worse. Say it with me: "A pilot shortage gives us leverage at the bargaining table."

It also may well have negated the bonuses and raises seen in the FFD segment, as well. Which is why the RAA are treating geezers like useful idiots in the age 67 fight: to fluff up the number of mainline pilots, allowing some stagnation at the regionals so the RAA can cut back on its bonus schemes, and maybe force rates back down. And if they do get 67 approved, they'll immediately start trying for 70.

It's pathetic to see all the old guys who are trying to line their pockets at the majority's expense, and in the process erode whatever labor scarcity we can bargain off of. These guys don't give a rat's ass about anyone other than themselves. Anyway, unfortuntely, the pilot shortage, to the extent it existed, is a thing of the past for the foreseeable future.

Last edited by StoneQOLdCrazy; 05-08-2024 at 04:00 PM.