Old 05-17-2024 | 01:29 AM
  #12  
AllYourBaseAreB
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,264
Likes: 129
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld
Life just doesn't work that way.

1. Airbus likely had more money to buy it than Embraer.

2. Launching the -500 first? Typically the smaller versions are launched first before the stretch. For example, 737-100 and 200 were launched before the 737-800 and Max.

That is how it works in real life.
It didnt cost a lot of money

The C-Series was selling poorly and widely regarded as a commercial flop. Airbus became a partner for peanuts to act as a stability booster. Then Boeing being Boeing lobbied to get ridiculous import duties imposed after the Delta order. Bombardier practically gave away the operation because it was a money loser at the time and Airbus could move production to the USA to avoid import duties.

Also, Airbus started with the midsize version of the 320 series in 1988, then the biggest in 1994 (321), then went small in 1996 (319), then smaller in 2003 (318)… defying historical precedence
Reply