Originally Posted by
Jamo
It was actually late December and that “agreement” was sprung on a few of them.
Sprung on them? So it is ok to spring a recall meeting but not a compromise? At the time it was sprung on them, there were 10 of the current 14 block reps on the MEC. 8 of those 10 supported the agreement. So, of those 8, whick ones had it sprung on them and decided to support it anyway? Those sound like reps that need to be replaced if they are going to support something they felt got sprung on them.
Originally Posted by
Jamo
Unfortunately the pro TA1 reps refusing to represent the will of the majority also refused to show up for the meeting and a quarum could not be met.
The will of the majority? 8 of those reps are still on the MEC. Funny, but 8 out of 14 reps is 57%, the same percentage that the TA failed by. What it seems like is that a smaller group of the majority didn't want to hear any other opinions, so they continued with recalls until they got their way. Well, they have no excuses now. I hope they deliver.