Originally Posted by Excargodog

Yep. Not trying to contradict you in any way. It's just that I continue to see people who believe that hiring for replacement in future years is entirely dependent on the number of people senior to them aging out of the system instead of realizing that there are often people yet to be hired that will be aging out before them. And for those who don't yet have a seniority number, many don't seem to know that those numbers for future replacement hires aren't static. For very young applicants they are very much not static. For some people that doesn't seem very intuitive.