Nothing in the Supreme ruling on Chevron deference took away from an agencies reglatory authority, and the FAA will continue to publish notices of proposed rule making, open them to public comment, and will continue to issue final rules in the course of it's congressional mandate to regulate aviation.

Even in the millenial (nee gen z, et al) age of "likes," public commentary on a rule will be considered, but is not now, nor ever will be a vote. Whether JSX gets "likes" in the comments or not, does not alter the spin of the world that much.

A bipartisan bill is not a congressman bought, particulalry if it gains traction among those who do have a say, in congress and the senate. That will take support on both sides of the aisle, and it's hard to argue that a congressman, in that case, is in the pocket of (pick a conspiracy theory and insert here).