Originally Posted by
waterskisabersw
To borrow your "fact" argument from another thread, did anybody actually get forced to take the shot? I mean yeah they sent out the letter but later retracted it and nobody was actually forced to take a shot. So it's all good, and now there's language in the contract, however imperfect you feel it is, to protect against even that?
If swa is bulletproof on furloughs, they're bulletproof on vaccine mandates too.
So the question is then did anyone actually get furloughed? I mean they got a letter but did anyone get furloughed? Same logic right?