Originally Posted by
LizzyBorden
Well, because CASM isn't just based on a pilots wage. Other labor groups figure into that CASM, that per hour on average are compensated at a much higher level. Then, we can talk about benefits, insurance, etc etc etc. If mainline could operate smaller aircraft at an equal profit margin as a CPA with a regional, they would do it.
I already explained why it takes money out of your pocket. If mainline cannot fly without making a profit, there is no sense in doing it. If a regional can fly it and make a profit, then there is sense in doing it. Then to throw restrictions into the mix that limit the amount of revenue that can be generated is pointless.
Again, you make unsubstantiated claims. Where is that magic size cutoff of mainline profitability? Prove your statement that the mainline cannot profitably fly smaller aircraft. Could United possibly be more profitable through outsourcing? Sure.
By your logic, United would outsource anything that could be flown more profitably by another carrier. No kidding. That's why we have scope language in our contract.