View Single Post
Old 05-17-2008 | 01:59 PM
  #70  
Shootinstr8
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by ChinsFive
That's what I'm saying!

Although it's not a clarification of scope it's additional protection. Letter 1 was written to protect us from being accuired by a holding company, if SKYW gets that thrown out - Section 1 isn't going to do anything for us.
I think letter 1 was written to prevent the pilots from being mis-used by mis-management. Its an insurance policy against whipsaw action. This should not be given away freely. If an acquiring company had our best interest in mind and wanted an exemption to the clause we might think about it but the protections should never be taken away. It also protected acquired pilots as well. It protected guys that did not have protection from language in their contract also. The intent was to further the well benefit of all pilots and not short shrift any group.
Reply