Originally Posted by
Ed Force One
They were opposed to 65 too. Then when it became obvious that it was going to pass, they suddenly were in support.
They had a reason to do that... a seat at the table so they could get some reasonable guard-rails baked into the legislation. Such as people under age 65 who had already retired were not entitled to return with seniority intact.
I was somewhat concerned this last time that they appeared to not be engaging the opposition... if the legislation had gotten through it might have been half-baked in some ways.