View Single Post
Old 11-25-2024 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
rickair7777's Avatar
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,632
Likes: 562
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by aeroengineer
For the smart people in the room. Do the props add to maintenance costs compared to jets? Also how do insurance costs compare? Thinking engine out in a multi jet versus a multi prop.
Yes MX cost is just a bit higher... same turbine core, plus a gearbox, prop hub, and associated gadgets. It's not a huge deal though, fuel savings still gives you a net win. All else being equal on a route that's suitable for props.

I'd assume insurance has to be a bit higher, but no first-hand knowledge...

Engine Thrust Failure: Prop needs to auto-feather. If it doesn't, pilots need to verify it and manually feather. If the feather just doesn't work at all, that can be bad. Although I know about an EMB-120 that had an engine fail with feather fail and they were able to do a pattern, come back and land fine, at a high altitude airport. It might have been cold, and don't recall if they were heavy at all.

Engine Structural Failure: We've seen a few spectacular fan failures in recent years. Dramatic news footage, but the planes did not seem to be in any more danger than a routine engine failure. When a turboprop hub comes apart, the plane is often lost.
Reply