Originally Posted by
89Pistons
It's funny you used the phrase "TAKE TAKE TAKE." In all of the diologue from those opposed to this LOA, where in the heck have you seen any "TAKE?" Those opposed to this LOA aren't asking to "TAKE" anything away. We currently don't have a cap. But you're the one that want's to give the company the easy ability to impose a PRAP cap. Step back and you'll realize that you're using a BS rationale in order to justify your vote. You're actually the one doing the taking. The no side doesn't want to "TAKE" anything away. We want this MBCBP to be implemented correctly. And to avoid having to pay for stuff in the next contract cycle that we already have.
OK, then let's go with ME ME ME. It's more accurate, thanks for pointing it out.
My vote began as a NO until i read, watched, and listened to all of the info provided by the MEC and discussed on various SM sites.
Youre HOPING the IRS approves a better plan structure right? Do you know what will be approved? You casually throw out the phrase "implemented correctly" as if you get to choose what "correctly" entails. Of course you are cool with passing up the opportunity for 1-2 years of CBP contributions vs PRAP cash if you don't have that spill anyway...
FWIW, I'm not 59 or older. I'm not even 58 yet.