Originally Posted by But seriously

I get why the membership voted this down, but I can’t figure out why people are mad about it and calling for recalls.
It wasn’t a totally unreasonable LOA. It would have started a tax sheltered program earlier than otherwise possible in exchange for starting it more conservatively than otherwise (likely) necessary.
I didn’t think the tradeoff was worth it, but it wasn’t a crazy option to propose and let the membership weigh in.

Originally Posted by khergan

It was bad, but agree they shouldn't be fired. They sold a turd, they look bad, now they can go back to the drawing board and give the membership what it wanted in the first place.