Originally Posted by
fcoolaiddrinker
yeah 1.1% initially was a bit of a stretch but knowing that would get better and better over time is part of the reason for the initial cost.
That sounds like a non answer to the question.
it’s not a non-answer. my 1.something rate will also get better over time, because we shift the burden to a younger person who wishes to buy. my answer is that two identical houses should have an identical tax burden.