Originally Posted by
ThumbsUp
I'm not doing that--just terms in office and general market performance. Taking advantage of a two-year flatline to overcome a 10% deficit in performance on a mature portfoio is Warren-buffet worthy. You missed your calling-I hear the University of Chicago needs some help in the Economics Department.
I may be Frankensteining a few previous posts on this thread so if I’m assign claims to you that you’re not making I apologize. I don’t think we’re quite arguing the same point so I’ll drop it.
To the broader argument I’ll just say it’s very hard to come to any sort of consensus when comparing 45 & 46 economies because COVID disrupted both & most people want to give one a pass & blame the other for its impacts. In any case I feel like that entire argument is made moot when 47 gives us fresh new opportunities to judge his economic savvy every day. If the tariff war really does create a new American boom that will be his victory to own. Today’s probably not the best day for spiking the football, though.