i agree, great post. just a small quibble with the above statement. our contract already dealt with what tsa holdings had to do if they wanted to create a gojet type company. they were supposed to use one seniority list, and pay agreed upon pay rates. all that was already spelled out in the tsa contract. tsa holdings management blatantly violated that contract, and got away with it in arbitration. then they came back and offered us the "new deal" that we rejected based on what you said above. this is why i laugh when people say things about "legally binding contracts".