Originally Posted by
bugman61
I’m not aware of any agreement between the scheduling committee and the company on reroute pay not being subject to the 120 day clock. If it exists in writing somewhere I’d like to see it. I would be shocked if I could go back to a rotation a year ago where I have not filed any disputes and say I was due reroute pay, and have the company pay it. There was an agreement that disputes field under ace/sts were automatically tolled WRT to other timelines in the pwa, I assume that is still in effect. However, reroute pay is not a bookkeeping error, and if it is exempt from 120 days that would need to come from someplace else.
How is reroute pay not a bookkeeping error? It’s not a violation of the contract to receive a reroute.
The contract simply states you are due X m (in the form of hours) for reroutes.
A *violation* of the PWA has a clock.
Since you disagree I won’t bother trying to defend the 200%.