Originally Posted by
G4er
The emails in June 2024 from the current negotiating team stated that they were offended that the company had passed a compromise proposal and they in return didn’t pass anything back. So either they said what happened and you are misinformed or they were lying about what went down and you are privy to that information.
From what you're saying it sounds like you think replying with a comprehensive proposal back then would have been a good idea? Is it safe to assume you think not putting yourself at a disadvantage early on by not responding to a below regional comp proposal you are somehow not taking negotiations seriously? AI can help inform you why comprehensive proposals are problematic in less than 2 mins. Do you realize there is a mediator guiding the sessions? The comp. p. back then was just a tactic to get you fired up and blame your union, which clearly worked on you but in reality the un-passed sections left won't be an issue. Even both sides will admit that scope, comp, retirement etc won't be an issue.