Originally Posted by
Bitcoin
From what you're saying it sounds like you think replying with a comprehensive proposal back then would have been a good idea? Is it safe to assume you think not putting yourself at a disadvantage early on by not responding to a below regional comp proposal you are somehow not taking negotiations seriously? AI can help inform you why comprehensive proposals are problematic in less than 2 mins. Do you realize there is a mediator guiding the sessions? The comp. p. back then was just a tactic to get you fired up and blame your union, which clearly worked on you but in reality the un-passed sections left won't be an issue. Even both sides will admit that scope, comp, retirement etc won't be an issue.
No, that’s not what I said, they said they didn’t offer anything in return (no passes of anything). Basically took their ball and went home. That’s great that everyone is in agreement that the non passes will not be an issue. Makes a guy wonder why we even have sessions.