Originally Posted by
Speed Select
Really?! We already have positive space commuting, with parameters (commuter clause). So we’re going to waste negotiating capital on something that every other employee group will subsequently demand? Goodbye profit sharing. Goodbye non-revving. (Please don’t say “non-revving is impossible”… my family successfully non-revs a lot and that’s an important benefit to this job for every employee group).
Ive also heard from TOP MEN that positive space commuting is an absolute non starter for the company. Lots of other things I’d like to see fixed in our contract. If positive space were to even be in the discussion with the company, we’d have to give up a lot to get it. What are you willing to give up?
We don't have it. It's not contractual and the company fights to not honor it anyways I'd happily take a no discipline UTC in the PWA as a starting point.
I don't know why you all fall for the company doom and gloom. You know that pilots ride in seats to work all the time and we are still the most profitable airline on earth. AND, when he has PSC, we are still the most profitable airline on earth.
To your comment that was effectively, "suck it up and move," you conveniently ignore the many, many jobs where living in your home office location is not required. You can live wherever you want and the company will fly you where there need you. Want to guess what all those jobs have in common? Extensive travel requirements