View Single Post
Old 07-30-2025 | 12:56 PM
  #109  
joepilot50
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 590
Likes: 176
Default

Originally Posted by BusBoi
One of my friends is an AA 73 captain and he said there's a lot of cultural opposition to taxi on one, and also they have pretty strict taxi thrust limitations that are hard to work with for the 737NG. At Spirit we used to have a 40% limitation, which was removed around the time I became a captain. Definitely made it easier as sometimes 40% just didn't cut it.

But yea, I've been on AA where we had a 40 minute taxi out and they ran both engines the whole time. That's fuel you could have in your tanks and could make the difference between diverting or not later in the flight.
They took out the hard limits in the AOM when SET became a bigger focus.

I SET an NG once when we had that 50 minute taxi. According to the CEFA app, that only saved 100 lb. Now for 2000 flights, 100 lb for every one of those is a lot of fuel saved for the company.
Reply