View Single Post
Old 08-01-2025 | 11:38 AM
  #123  
Judge Smails's Avatar
Judge Smails
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 944
Likes: 256
From: A320
Default

Originally Posted by BusBoi
One of my friends is an AA 73 captain and he said there's a lot of cultural opposition to taxi on one, and also they have pretty strict taxi thrust limitations that are hard to work with for the 737NG. At Spirit we used to have a 40% limitation, which was removed around the time I became a captain. Definitely made it easier as sometimes 40% just didn't cut it.

But yea, I've been on AA where we had a 40 minute taxi out and they ran both engines the whole time. That's fuel you could have in your tanks and could make the difference between diverting or not later in the flight.
The other thing is AA needs to upgrade the software to allow for SETWA (Single Engine Taxi Without APU) on the 320's. Single engine taxiing with the APU running doesn't do much to save fuel. We have a cultural problem here when it comes to fuel usage in general with tens of millions of $$ wasted every quarter.
Reply