Originally Posted by
Gone Flying
-who does what in an abort should be standard
-request ARFF for any fire indication or any abort above 80 should be standard. (And can we get away from “roll the trucks”)
Originally Posted by
Guppydriver95
It SHOULD be standard, yes. The reason for briefing it at the start of a trip is to reinforce and bring to top of mind, much like an engine failure. Multiple human factors studies have shown the benefit of performance in these scenarios if they were briefed vs the lazy “standard brief” nonsense.
Originally Posted by
GogglesPisano
Next thing you guys will be saying we shouldn't ask the FA's if they're familiar with red or yellow emergency, or what to do in case of a medical event. /s
Why do we brief? Decades of CRM and human factors analysis and studies indicate that pilots sharing the same mental model is a tremendous benefit to execution. That's why we brief.
What would non brief email brief cowboys do when getting a line check?
It's our procedure. It's spelled out in our guidance and reenforced in our training and standards checks. It doesn't take long and the brief really does have purpose and benefits that are scientifically proven and supported by operational analysis of events.