View Single Post
Old 08-08-2025 | 11:30 AM
  #310  
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
MasterOfPuppets
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 205
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by OneDayCloser
I don’t disagree with you regarding the loss of audio comprehension during a high stress situation. The only reason I said the Captain could retain abort authority is to satisfy your idea that FOs doing so would cause a massive increase in unnecessary RTOs.

The reality is, I believe the safest course of action is dual abort authority, as others have said. Whoever sees the issue, calls the abort and the PF accomplishes the procedure without question. Just like a go-around. We can work out the “why” after. If it causes a delay, so be it. Better that than take an aircraft in the air when one or more pilot isn’t comfortable with the situation or is missing the big picture of what is actually going on.

During the high speed regime, especially with the acceleration rates of our aircraft, there isn’t time to discuss “what you see” or maybe even process it to make a decision. I’ve flown 24 years in environments where this was the normal policy, have had a few RTOs over that time and it always worked very well. I’ve never experienced unnecessary aborts becaming a problem.

If FOs aren’t experienced enough to make the call or if they are making the call incorrectly, it’s a training and / or hiring problem.

I agree 100% and at United either pilot can call a reject no questions asked. I’m not advocating for the removal of CRM.

I also fly the 756 so I am aware of the inhibits but at United we have had rejects for a simple caution EICAS. That’s specifically why I DONT mention Cautions or Warnings. At United cautions and system failures are CONSIDERATIONS for a reject. So as A CA I have the authority to say CONTINUING for any EICAS message. The FO has the responsibility to bring the issue to my attention.
Reply