View Single Post
Old 08-19-2025 | 06:08 PM
  #208  
taketheshot
Old Hire
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 73
Likes: 13
From: 320 CP
Default

Originally Posted by av8nallday
But is it wrong…..
No it’s pretty spot on for the most part. We aren’t large enough to bargain for the latest and greatest we get what the legacies work for minus 5% because we’re smaller and a ULCC. That’s what you’re getting at with “who we work for” I think. Look at where we fell before everyone’s last round.. approximately within 5%, that’s where we should land again. Much less and I’ll vote no.

As far as “the company can’t afford it” line I keep hearing.. that’s what they said last time. Are you aware of our profits before and after our last CBA?

2016: +200M
2017: +162M
2018: +80M
2019: CBA ratified +251M

Strange how they just couldn’t pay and the year we get a CBA we make $251M and BB said “I thought it would be more”. He’s got 90% of us right where he wants us, wake up and have some respect for yourselves. I don’t care what Bob thinks, we have hundreds of lives in our hands and we do a job that is HIGHLY skilled. We get paid, or we vote no. It’s simple.
Reply