Originally Posted by
AKCattleCarrier
I’ve never read a 10Q does it also mention aircraft retirements? I.E. how many of those are planned tail growth? I feel like we need to start talking about growth only in terms of # of tails because everything else doesn’t mean ****e to pilots. If they take on a bunch of -10s and unload a bunch of 800s they will cheerlead about growth while we experience no seniority progression.
Not familiar with the politics. But with a pro-business administration I would imagine there is pressure to pencil-whip the -7 and -10.
They haven’t announced anything yet but our highest time airframes are the 700s. Not sure what they can be replaced with though.