Old 08-27-2025 | 07:32 PM
  #9424  
marcal
Line Holder
Liked
20 Years
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 121
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Yeah the tone sucked, but losing that grievance sucks worse. Now they can give a RES a 1 day trip then tag on 5 more and there's no reroute pay due.
If you read the arbitrators ruling you will see we didn't lose because we were wrong.

We lost because ALPA changed what the argument was over between the initial grievance and the appeal to the 5-member board. This was a case of semantics and to be honest, a failure on ALPA's part.

One more major issue -- the arbitrator straight up was like "you're contract is entirely too complex".

Ironically, the new RR rules in terms of pay, I thought were to make it way simpler. It has had the opposite effect. The company is now simply throwing their hands up knowing full well ALPA is understaffed to track it all in a timely fashion.

Perhaps ripping into Gumm and personally insulting him at the last MEC meeting wasn't a good move in terms of enamoring him with being more open to help smooth these issues out(whether it was warranted or not).

All I know is that the issues between the company and ALPA are getting uglier by the day and it isn't getting fixed anytime soon. Best of luck to us all.
Reply