Originally Posted by
BusBoi
Wait, what’s the logic in only letting FOs take the voluntary, and why is that specifically a bad sign?
100% a cost savings play. I’m on year three pay as an FO that is within the furlough range and I’d get around a $30,000 payout. Captains could easily get double that. Feels like most of our attrition typically is from the left seat so the odds of someone taking a voluntary furlough that is a captain is higher than a FO. Just a hunch