Originally Posted by
FangsF15
401(k) contributions, or LTD protections? I can see how the latter is (maybe) at risk, but not the former. At least, not what we have currently negotiated, anyway.
One of the reasons we are able to justify the level of retirement benefit we have is because we have a mandatory retirement age. I don’t think it would be crazy to think changing the mandatory retirement age would have a negative effect on our DC %
IMO LTD wouldn’t change much with 67. It’s my understanding we have actually improved LTD since 65 went into effect. If 70+ happens tho I’d say all bets are off. But while I see 67 as a possibility, it’s hard to believe the law would change to allow 70+. Recently net jets was able to implement a mandatory age 70 retirement after years of no age.