Originally Posted by
FangsF15
Those making that argument believe the company will be less willing/able to put money in other parts of the contract, because they know those costs to the penny. So it will be an indirect impact.
In effect, it will rob other parts of future contract gains to 'fund' the increase in LTD payments.
in other words, someone’s going to pay for an age increase. That someone is everyone, exspecially those who will be around for a while. how again is that fair?