Originally Posted by
PineappleXpres
Still feels like corner cutting to get to 67. I don’t use corner cutting logic too often. Doesn’t apply to
the gov of course. Purely political and nothing is logic based.
Corner cutting? A study would take a while.
My personal take is that government should not infringe unnecessarily on our liberties, and that includes livelihood. I also suspect but don't know that 65 is to low... which is why I'm in favor of a robust study, without any undue delay. Who knows? They might lower the age.
But if ICAO does it, we almost certainly will follow immediately. Apparently the administration is in favor, and they have votes to pass a minor bill, or attach it to something else (if you think the dems would filibuster over THAT of all things, you're smoking crack rolled up in your ALPA magazine).