Originally Posted by
AirportJunkie
Kirk’s stance and any stance allowing unfettered and unrestricted use of the 2nd amendment puts you, me, very ironically him at greater risk of getting unnecessarily murdered by someone who has no record with a gun. Until many of you can realize that there are far to many guns in the US, acts like this will continue to happen.
At this point talk is cheap, there is a very real problem in this country with gun ownership and without action completely innocent people will continue to be unnecessarily murdered….
The ”gun” issue is a moot argument in this case. Charlie was killed by a hunting rifle. A very high powered hunting rifle.
Hunting rifles are not restricted and necessary equipment for those that live in rural areas.