Thread: MAX7
View Single Post
Old 09-19-2025 | 08:09 AM
  #218  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
ZapBrannigan
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,950
Likes: 110
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by WHACKMASTER
Um, really? Lesser need for a smaller aircraft? TUS-PHX or MKE-MDW needs a MAX8 on it? Okay…..

If anything, hub and spoke more so requires a smaller aircraft to feed the hub.
I've been saying that for years. We need a small airplane before we get a bigger one. Smaller airplanes to provide incremental feed to fill a widebody year round.

That said, RJs are high CASM products, so maybe not TOO small.

USAir carried 175 pax in the 757 in 1999.
They carried 144 in the 737-400 (which is the same size as the 800).

Our 737s carry as many people as their 757s did. We cram a lot of people into these suckers, so a smaller airplane is appropriate to feed the “mainline” for lack of a better term.

i like the Breeze idea. I wonder if Neeleman still harbors a grudge from when Herb fired him?

Reply