Originally Posted by
putzin
The vote comes back “Nay”, company asks judge to void the contract, 1113, judge throws out/reduces what he needs to until $100 million is achieved or maybe more.
This thing is being rushed, Davis is playing catchup, there is no time to recall the mec. It’s 12 days of negotiation that needs to be done by oct 1. There were more “than about 2 questions” and you could leave them with your opinion at the end. The whole process is a sh:t sandwich. Plenty of people that will vote no because they’re angry at the company, mec or both and plenty that are waiting for the end result and whatever that looks like. How they vote I have no idea, we’ve all heard plenty of opinions.
It’s lots of fun on the inside, plan accordingly.
If the union reps vote in a concessionary TA/LOA, and the members kill it, the only thing a judge will do is override them and activate the Union leadership agreed TA/LOA.
He’s not going to clean sheet a deal, or not include the Union leadership. Activating what Union and company leadership already agreed to is a slam dunk for a judge, why wade any further out into a mess. No judge wants to be in the weeds of a contract or risk a labor over reaction.
It’s a free no vote the members, but possibly inevitable for their future.