Originally Posted by
Boomer
The judge’s choice is binary. He can impose the company 1113 proposal or he can reject the company’s 1113 proposal. There is no third choice letting the judge rewrite portions of the CBA as he sees best.
The company’s 1113 proposal is going to be the deal they got with the Union leadership approval.
Being greedy will get it rejected. There is no reason to force labor unrest by beating down the membership and the leadership.
The company already got to play their greedy card when they asked for 100m without showing their math. Their lawyers will tell them not to get caught sandbagging a judge with a poor mouth after they agreed to a deal with union leadership.