Originally Posted by
coldpilot
I think that's a poor shot at creating an analogy but whatever.
It's not like I went to TSA and said "Hey come lease these Eagle airplanes."
The point behind it is that its BS that guys here, myself included, are looking at being on the street come fall while airplanes that are owned by Eagle are leased to a competitor. It's a violation of our scope clause. Now I will give you the fact that the company won that grievance because Eagle was in a time of "significant growth" and couldn't staff the airplanes at the time. Well if guys here are furloughed that becomes erroneous. That is the issue at hand.
Maybe so.
Can you find the exact scope clause wording? I'd like to see it if possible.