View Single Post
Old 10-15-2025 | 08:13 AM
  #211  
dracir1
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 112
From: Lineholder
Default

Originally Posted by fcoolaiddrinker
Feed back is good no problem. Every carrier including f9 has the same tafb 1-3.5. No need to discuss that. We need to add in min calendar while at the same time keeping min duty to avoid what you just outlined. That’s what min duty fixed last round.
There is an EASIER and more common sense reason for better pairing construction. Safety.

Anytime there is a late night (local) time departure with a > 18 hour layover and early morning (out station) departure, you have a circadium rhythm swap for the crew. Despite best efforts, we all know how hard it is to prepare our bodies for a redeye flight only to have to start flying the next leg 6-9 hours later than the previous leg. We have been a fortunate group w/ not having an incident based on pairing induced fatigue.

I propose there should be a rule for ALL multi-day pairings that the show times of the days following the first day cannot vary by more than 4 hours. For instance, if a pairing show time starts at noon, the show times for EACH DAY of that pairing following must be between 8am and 4 pm. This would, of course, eliminate odd timed layovers of 24 hours and the need for pilots to try and adjust their rest/sleep habits by 8+ hours within a 24 hour period.
Reply