Originally Posted by
Hotel Kilo
No, you didn't mean to add that part. You posted the link, didn't bother to read the article thoroughly, and when I called you out for it then you have this sudden recall.
This has been an interesting discussion, It's managed to stay relatively civil. Which is nice for a change. However, I don't think we're changing any minds here so at this time I'll respectfully bow out.
I just want to add one thing. I'm not opposed and I'd argue that most people aren't opposed to nuclear or having some level of fossil fuel plants. But the analogy I'm going to make it what I'm hearing.
Imagine if this discussion was occuring in 1920 over airplanes. Liberals would be arguing that airplanes would be like flying super hotels, trains would be obsolete and everyone would just fly to work every day. Conservatives would be saying airplanes are impractical because they can only carry a few people and so any further investment or research is a complete waste of time. Rail and trolleys are the future. Neither of them are right