Originally Posted by
crewdawg
Ah I see what you're saying now, yes that's a great point. I agree that the overlapping footprint thing is the best option.
Something else to consider…GS isn’t the only step of the trip coverage ladder they skip.
Back to hypotheticals with the “counter” idea, which I think we agree isn’t the best fix…
Let’s say #1 has a WS in for a 1 day and is looking for a 3-4 day GS at some point in the month. CS decides to use the A function on the 1 day, so #1 gets paid 23M7 for the WS but later in the month they also use the A code at the GS step and now #1 misses the 3-4 day GS, but somebody junior gets paid because #1 already got 23M7#1. Unfortunately, the company choosing to go to the A Code isn’t the pilots choice and senior should still be paid for both of these…unless overlapping…😅
Ok, I feel like I beat the dead horse on the counter now 😅