Originally Posted by
crewdawg
A 23M7 counter would be a good idea. I also wouldn't be opposed to some close in timeline that skips OOBWS. I use OOBWS, but I don't auto accept and then never reject stuff I'm not going to fly. Watched as a trip sat on three different O lines with no rejection before going IA. These guys are just fishing. Off course I'd prefer they start coverage sooner and have a more automated process.
I like the 23M7 counter for the fact that it would force the company to develop automation. There's no way that remains a manual process if people can track it and find out they were missed. Just like I can pretty much guess when I'm next up for a GS, I could drill down on 23M7 and see it was done correctly.