Originally Posted by
joepilot50
But same time, if LEPF is going to scream 67 is safe, then it is on them to show the proof.
Usually the onus of proof is on the person making the claim. It is like someone claiming the sky is green, gets called on it, but just tells us to do our own research and they aren't going to provide the proof of their claim and believes it is actually us needing to provide the proof.
Two people in a civil lawsuit, sure. The plaintiff has to prove a claim.
But in the case of government imposing itself on freedoms (especially constitutional freedoms) the burden is on .gov. You can of course debate what constitutes adequate proof in this case, but I know it's not union political influence.