Originally Posted by
Buck Rogers
So, I imagine when
older pilots support age 67, you would call them greedy because their extra 2 years of, "work less make more" good fortune, would come at your expense....therefore they are GREEDY.
But when you want to work less and make more on the backs of the traveling public & the company....that is righteous?
I don't look gift horses in the mouth, by the same token, I don't actively wish for/root for ill will/hardships on others, so that I can reap unexpected windfalls. But, you do you
Yes, that is greedy, because it is a novel provision that knowingly has tangible negative consequences for other pilots.
Whereas the original intent of his post meant to maximize the pay:work ratio using status quo provisions (and no new parties are harmed nor helped).