Originally Posted by AntiCompanyMan

If you really think investing in a new technology as part of a global effort to reduce carbon emissions is the same as directly donating to a party for a politician solely to stroke an ego, then we disagree on the mechanics of how things work.

"The methods look different"

One is a bribe, the other is a business strategy that happened to align with a trend of the day. I also don't remember any press conferences with CEOs for the sole purpose of flattering the president under the previous administration.

It is not the same merely because you proclaim it the same. It's not "semantics." These are the facts.

Again, still waiting for directions to the iceberg