Originally Posted by
Cholla6918
I hear your points about HA’s model being outdated and Alaska buying at the right moment, but if the international authorities, slots, and brand really weren’t worth acquiring, what would you recommend Alaska should have done instead? Simply staying “fine the way it was” doesn’t create new growth opportunities, and those assets aren’t something you can just buy when convenient. Even if HA had operational problems, the underlying value of what they controlled still existed — so what alternative path would’ve realistically produced a better long-term outcome for AS?
Being bought by DL or UA. AS is a niche carrier desperately trying to reinvent itself. The AS pilots would have been better off waiting to get bought.
And on the labor side, if the merger is as lopsided or misguided as you suggest, what do you think can actually be accomplished by opposing the integration path we’re on now? We still need a unified pilot group and predictable costs for any plan — good or bad — to function. So what’s the practical strategy that gets pilots to a better place from here, rather than just pointing out why the current direction is flawed?
It does absolutely nothing. When it comes to this company and union I’m a nihilist. You can hold signs, wear lanyards, , write your rep, volunteer at your union. Nothing is going to change the outcomes. ALPA policy is clear on SLI’s. The fix is in on the AS pilots. There will be winners and losers. And your ALPA representatives will continue to avoid the line and stay in $800/night hotels in DC to make sure they don’t miss that conference on single pilot ops.
Go to work, operate safely in accordance policy and procedure, walk off the airplane and never think about this place. And try to avoid layover so Im not tempted to log on to this stupid forum.