Originally Posted by
OOfff
any change that has a non-zero impact on operational reliability needs a quid.
even if this is true—but neither of us has the data—an increase in the minority of problems will have a cost.
that’s a nice thought, but what “should” be done isn’t always done. anything that has a cost, and anything that has a value to us, is a negotiating point. how much capital are you willing to spend for this?
Again, with the quid. The company already offers PS when waivers/IROPs are in effect.
We're just moving our language to something more industry standard. It's not going to be as hard as you imagine. But hey, neither you or I are on the NC, so lets see what comes up. I think commuting is going to be a focus this time around. More than 1/2 the air line commutes by air and of the rest everyone drives or trains into work. I don't think it will change much (stated that earlier), but it would be nice if something happens here in 23X.
You certainly can agree our commuter language is pretty poor.