Originally Posted by
OOfff
do you have any data to support the idea that “tightening up” recurrent under the current system would meaningfully improve safety? i would love to see it if you do.
Compared to changing a random boot off campus date by 730days?
yes
common friggin’ sense
As far as MEANINGFULLY improving the false god of “safety”, no.
Hardening up recurrents will not make a huge difference, just like 65 vs 67 won’t make a difference, because most 121 flying is already so sterilized, regimented, the planes already have so many redundant systems & nanny features, think it’s about as safe as screeching across the sky in a tin can can be.