Originally Posted by
PineappleXpres
So the solution is displace before vacancy. Least harm? And yet that’s not how the company does things. Curious why.
Originally Posted by
MrBogardi
Would that actually change anything or is just something to be mad about?
I'm not sure it changes much. You could I think come up with scenarios to make a case either way. Might be in the eye of the beholder.