Originally Posted by
notEnuf
#1 we should have gotten a vote. That would have required a presentation of the facts and issues. If we have leverage then there's a discussion about how to use it, why are you opposed to this?
im not opposed to a vote but there was absolutely no need for one. If you disagree, tell your reps. If enough people disagree, they’ll start holding (meaningless) votes. They are elected and will ultimately do what a majority of their constituents want. I strongly suspect most people don’t feel as you do, or at least not strongly enough to care, and that’s why votes don’t happen.
The MOU further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating, changed the 23M7/IA process from a chaotic, seniority-abrogating mess into an orderly and efficient process, and did so without a single concession, all while also maintaining the same level 23M7 pay (which a lot of suggestions on here would’ve reduced).