Originally Posted by
notEnuf
I'm arguing we will never know because we already "solved" the problem. And the fog of numbers isn't even enough to start the conversation. It was a rush to do "something" when we didn't need to do anything. And got nothing, except an ALPA endorsement of the current practice and a pinky swear.
you’ll never know, but you know it would have been better.
and the “alpa endorsement of current practice” is not, since it changed the coverage system and includes hard lockouts to identify proper payment in the moment. i get that you’re opposed to it, but why intentionally mischaracterize it?